Zsombor Piros vs Hady Habib Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the past six months, second serve performance has been a crucial determinant in predicting match outcomes. During this period, Habib has managed to secure 50.17% of points on their second serve, surpassing Piros, who holds a 43.4% success rate. This statistic often plays a critical role in match predictions. Meanwhile, when it comes to return game statistics, both players demonstrate an almost equal prowess. Habib has won 45.41% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly trailing behind Piros, who stands at 45.69%. However, for first servce returns, Piros is more effective, winning 28.7% of points compared to Habib's 18.39%.

Breaking down performance under pressure reveals that Habib has a stronger breakpoint-saving capability. With a 67.31% success rate in saving breakpoints, Habib is ahead of Piros, who has managed a 49.43% save rate. This statistic serves as a valuable predictor for in-game betting scenarios. Considering their overall performance from the past year, Habib exhibits a slightly better match-winning percentage of 60.56% (W/L 43/28), as opposed to Piros's 59.09% (W/L 39/27). Analyzing their head-to-head predicts nuances based on these figures.

Examining their career win percentages across different surfaces, Habib thrives on Hard courts, maintaining a win rate of 68% (W/L 190/91), while Piros excels on Clay with a 66% win rate (W/L 190/97). Conversely, I.hard surfaces challenge Habib with a mere 49% win rate (W/L 17/18) and Hard courts are less successful for Piros, with a 52% win rate (W/L 44/41). Both players largely compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Habib winning 63.46% of matches (W/L 33/19) and Piros at 64.29% (W/L 36/20). Event level relative comparisons often aid in evaluating favorites.

Opponent quality analysis provides additional insights: over the past 12 months, Habib has faced opponents with an average rank of 283.97, while Piros's opponents have averaged 275.27. In terms of deciding set performance, Habib holds an edge with a 65% win rate, compared to Piros's 55%. As a key factor in live predictions and betting strategies, this could influence match outcomes. Breakpoint conversion rates further inform predictions, where Habib converts 25% of opportunities and Piros converts 33.73% of chances.

When synthesizing all these statistical insights to predict the winner, Habib emerges as slightly more favorable due to their superior second serve point win rate, ability to save breakpoints, and winning record on Hard courts. Despite the strengths Piros holds, especially on Clay surfaces, Habib's overall statistics position them as the potential victor in their head-to-head match.